Well, I guess the title gives away the content of this
posting then. Let’s leap straight to the finale, I passed my 6th dan
Jodo examination a couple of Sundays back at the European Jodo Championships in
Brussels along with my partner Harry and one other candidate, Chantal from
France. The seminar was led by three Japanese sensei:
-
Tominaga Sensei, Hanshi 8th dan
-
Kurogo Sensei, Hanshi 8th dan
-
Arai Sensei, Kyoshi 8th dan
It was a fairly interesting seminar for me as I had already
been to three previous main seminars with 8th dans at them and so to
see how each explained the latest emphases was going to be insightful.
As I haven’t really detailed my Jodo training what with my
Iaido 6th dan taking centre stage for so long I ought to outline
what I have done during 2012 to push my Jodo further:
Villingen Seminar
We had two and a half days with Ishido Sensei, assisted by
Hayashi Sensei, in Villingen this year. I now find these smaller seminars far
more beneficial than the larger summer events as there are fewer people that
attend (just) and they generally have a higher distribution of grades in
attendance. To request, Ishido Sensei spent the first half day holding a senior
session with the 5th dans and above to cement the important points
for seitei. I will summarise what the majority of these are later.
Japan
Harry and I had one week in Kawasaki regularly training with
Ishido Sensei. This only allowed us one evening’s training with the Shinbukan students
and very little feedback. I did however try to identify what the students their
exhibited as part of their Jodo and I guess I would have to say that it was to
do with effortlessness. Soft and efficient technique seems to be mainstay of
the training and one didn’t feel like they were being intimidated when they
trained. Everyone focussed on improving themselves and not at the expense of
their partner. We also had the fortune of attending the 30th
Kanagawa Ken Taikai and the 1st Commemorative Yano Sensei taikai
which was extremely enjoyable and has been detailed in another post.
Eindhoven Seminar
Ishido Sensei once again insisted on a total of a five-day
seminar rather than the six and this worked out quite nicely. I had a good
opportunity to train with Janet Griffiths as well who was about to go to Japan
to try her 6th dan (which she passed – well done Jan!). Shoji
Sensei, Miyagi-ken’s new 8th dan took a large part of the seminar
and went over the salient points of what was considered important to the ZNKR
Jodobu. As well as doing lots of training with Harry I had some opportunity to
also do some nice training with Margherita from Italy, Catja from Switzerland
(sorry for the bad spelling all) and many others. This enforced training with
people one hasn’t trained with before is extremely useful and insightful.
British Kendo
Association Summer Seminar
Otake Sensei, kyoshi 8th dan from Kanagawa led
the seminar this year. I have to say right now that he is one of my favourite
Jodo teachers. He is the perennial student and an absolute technician. His
enthusiasm and studiousness is infectious and you get to feel like he shares
everything he knows. One never feels ashamed to ask him any question regardless
how stupid and he is generally always able to answer. On the last day he gave
the “soon to be grading” group a run for their money and put them through the
mincer – very useful it was too.
And so back to Brussels. I tried my best to participate
although I was nursing a very sore back and neck that had locked up in the last
couple of days (from lying on my sofa of all things). We did a bit of tandoku
dosa on the first afternoon followed by a quick run through the salient points
of Seiteigata. The referees seminar consisted merely of practice and going
through the 3-man team procedure.
The next day was the taikai starting with the team event. It
is wonderful to see how the various participating countries have moved up to
similar levels as everyone else nowadays. There are no foregone conclusions and
the veteran countries of the earlier years are constantly stressed into doing
their utmost best to beat relatively newer countries which have no leaders
above 4th or 5th dan.
I was delighted to see the UK team come second to the host
country, Belgium, and I am sure it was a close thing. The team was led by
Aurelien Nacrour (Taisho), with Daniel Silk as Chuken and Jo Hirst as Senpo.
The individuals took up the afternoon and after a long wait
the 5th dan division started. Both Harry and I won our individual
pools which meant we wouldn’t meet before the final…and then surprise, we both made it through to the final. As the
finals were run at the end of the day, Harry chose Catja as her uchidachi and I
chose Aurelien. The fight took place and I was unfortunately aware that I was
using a little bit too much strength in the final strikes as I am apt to do in
finals. The flags went up and Harry won 2-1. I looked at Aurelien and we both
grinned like cats. This was the first time Harry had won a European Jodo Taikai
(she had previously only won a bronze and that was in a taikai with only about
3 people). I was so delighted with her. I had lost and yet somehow I had also
won. I can say with all honesty that this was the best result to me. I had won
lots of taikai before and the feeling of elation was fleeting, lasting only
about 5 seconds as one is walking off. For Harry though I am sure this was a
big thing and so it was a big thing for me too…just before our 6th
dan exam too!
We had a bit of time in the afternoon to practice before the
grading as we were doing the okuridashi system. This meant:
1.
Harry tachi’d me.
2.
I tachi’d Chantal.
3.
Chantal tachi’d Len.
4.
Len tachi’d Harry.
Poor Harry, she had to stay on the longest before it was her
time to do the jo. After the 6th dan candidates I tachi’d for Chris
Buxton who was the sole 7th dan candidate. Funnily enough I was
feeling much better about that embu than my own.
My thanks to George Valkov for recording our taikai as well as our gradings.
The results went up. Harry, Chantal and I had passed and so
had Chris Buxton! The dojo went a bit mad. It was fantastic. Chris has been
trying on and off for 7th Jodo since around 2003 (I think Papendal
was his first try). Although I train a lot with Chris and helped him prepare
for 7th dan I think this is the first or second time only that I had
tachi’d him for his grading so it was a great honour for me to see him pass; I
don’t mean that with conceit, I am sincerely pleased that he passed and know
that he did it on his own steam.
Fay Goodman also passed 5th dan which was great
to see as she has also been going to European seminars this past couple of
years to get extra training at Ishido Sensei’s seminars.
And so, menjo’s were awarded, tears were shed (i.e. the
menjo registration fee was over 100 Euros!) and thanks were given.
Where to go with this? I haven’t yet decided what I want the
6th dan to mean for me and how I want to recreate myself with this.
I have done it with my Iaido 6th dan but I’m not sure about my Jodo.
I certainly want to be more consistent in my Jodo and I want the catches in
Kuritsuke, Kurihanashi and Taiatari to be more reliable. I realise that Rai
Uchi has its own very unique challenge regarding sharp timing but other than
that I don’t feel an Achilles Heel in my seitei
jodo – that’s not to say of course that they couldn’t all be improved,
I’m just reflecting that most people have a least favourite seitei iaido form,
I don’t have the same thing for Jodo.
Key Findings
I don’t want to pretend to have reached some form of
enlightenment from this experience, just as I have with the rest of the Shugyo
blog, I merely want to reflect and share some of the things I have learned
along the way. I guess for Jodo, the majority of the key points are very
general and don’t refer to any particular grade; the quality and quantity with
which one applies these points though of course becomes more critical as one
progresses up the grades.
In no particular order:
- Ma-ai (distance)
Ishido Sensei stressed this as
being a factor not considered strongly enough amongst the European students on
more than one occasion this year. In
particular, Seiteigata has very strict definitions of what the distance is
between Shi and Uchi through every point of the kata. How this is created is
important as well as how it is then further utilised, for example:
-
With two-step cutting distances it is important
that the Uchidachi doesn’t lift the sword on the first step but waits until the
second step is well underway before lifting and cutting.
-
With one-step cutting distances, the lifting of
the sword and cutting commences almost simultaneously and should be executed
without delay (or without sukima – opening).
At these one-step cutting
distances it is important to check that neither side should be able to hit each
other without moving. However, if they are too far away then they are not in issoku-ittou-no-maai (one-step cutting distance) therefore the
approach should bring the Uchidachi right up to the very danger limit. Both
sides should sense a danger within this proximity akin to standing on the very
edge of a cliff. Without this critical sense of danger there is no longer any
point in the Uchidachi stopping as they do in Seitei – this is the very meaning
of the pause – to exude, exhibit and sense this danger zone.
There are two other factors of
distance which are important in Seiteigata, those being Chijimeru and Nobasu which
respectively mean “to shorten” and “to lengthen”. More than is realised, these
two actions happen in nearly every kata but they are more easily identified in
Katas 3 and 12, Hissage and Ran Ai.
In Hissage, from the initial awase distance, the action of the Shijo
as the Uchidachi moves into Jodan Kamae is to lengthen (nobasu) the distance between them thus creating a brief pause
during which the Uchidachi has to recalculate and re-establish their
distance. While the word “Hissage” means
to carry in one’s hands, I believe that the name is a play on words as the
individual characters that make up the name mean to “draw back” which is the
ultimate action of the Shijo at the aforementioned point.
In Ran Ai, after the initial encounter from which
the Uchidachi draws the sword up and back and the Shijo steps back to
hikiotoshi, the next action of the Shijo is to suddenly and drastically shorten
(chijimeru) the distance thus forcing
the Uchidachi to arrest their forward movement and make a shorter cut. Again
this sudden change of distance along with the action of seme causes the Uchidachi to pause briefly in jodan kamae allowing
the Shijo to execute their next technique (the outside kuritsuke).
The importance and the effect of these two actions
are often overlooked as the exponent focusses on what to do with the stick
rather than considering what to do with their feet.
- Ma (timing)
It would be inappropriate for me to say at my level
that I have a consistent understanding of what overall the timing of the katas
should be. I am certain that the individual levels of the exponents, the kind
of training they are doing and their individual physical criteria and feeling
all play a part in dictating the katas timing. Certainly at 6th dan
level it was clearly expressed to us that clear and steady timing of the katas
was important rather than focussing on speed.
The aspect of timing which I have learned is a) of
utmost importance and b) often overlooked is: timing with regard to one’s opponent. We have often been told of
late that as individuals we are doing the techniques very well but we are not
doing them in accordance to what the opponent is doing. Kuritsuke is a good
example: moving too late is generally unheard of but moving too early provides
the Uchidachi an opportunity to change directions and cut to where the Shijo is
moving to.
The Japanese term is “aite o ishiki suru” that is “to be aware of one’s opponent”. This
doesn’t of course merely realise that they are there and thundering towards you
but that you are actively and carefully monitoring their position and movement.
Ultimately in Jodo, the timing of the Shijo’s movements are, and I don’t like
to use this word, dictated by the timing of the Uchidachi. The reason why I
don’t like to use this word is that it can be wrongfully equated to mean that
the Uchidachi controls the Shijo’s timing – I don’t mean this. The subtle
nuance I mean to communicate is that the Shijo’s timing is dependent on various
aspects of the Uchidachi’s timing….I think I might have laboured this point a
lot now.
On the side of the Uchidachi there are equally
important factors to consider. In a two-step cut, revealing ones intention by
lifting the sword too early leaves an easy opening for the Shijo to evade or
counterattack. The timing should be set to the very limit of unexpectedness
just like the distance mentioned before. The term “giri giri made” is often used to describe both timing and distance
and means “to the very edge” or “to the very last moment”.
Furthermore, it should be considered that in long
katas the general rhythm of the form is dictated by the Uchidachi and it is
important that one’s form does not become too “busy”. This is best understood
through an example in either Kasumi, Midare Dome or Ran Ai when the Uchidachi
has to step back into hasso kamae to make a new attack. Without the tiniest
brief pause or change of pace it looks like the Uchidachi has pre-empted the
next attack and hasn’t taken the time to check distance and the availability of
the target. While physically stopping (“tome”)
is not advanced Jodo, a moment of re-establishing one’s position and
accumulating intent (“tame”) provides
a good tempo to the form. My own teacher does this very well, on receiving, for
example, a Tai Atari he moves back regaining his balance and for just a split
second he is at a two-step cutting distance to the Shijo during which a
split-second decision is made and he returns for the next cut. It is very
perturbing for the Shijo.
- Ashi Sabaki (footwork)
It’s very strange and I’m sure most people don’t
notice it but if one were to measure the amount of time that the average 8th
dan spends explaining and demonstrating footwork compared to how much time they
spend on the action of the stick itself I am sure the proportions would be
around 5:1 in favour of footwork. Yet, we spend so much time worrying about and
correcting the jo and taikai shinpan strain their eyes to look to make sure the
jo has landed in the right place……
The Seitei manual makes it very clear about the
correct positioning of the feet and how they relate to the angle of the hips
and thereby the shoulders and upper body. There are only a few foot positions
but they have to be clearly distinguished and correctly executed. Blurring one
to another is out as is moving outside of the carefully described limits on
angles and weight distribution.
Of much interest of late was a teaching from Otake
Sensei who emphasised that in Yaya Hanmi (for honte no kamae for example) that
the weight in the rear foot should be distributed to the ball of the foot so
that the rear heel can ever so slightly be lifted from the floor (and by that I
mean by about 1mm). Furthermore, when moving forwards from a static position,
the distribution of weight should be so that 55-60% of the weight is on the
front foot. Just like Seitei iai as well, rotation of the feet is best done on
the balls of the feet and not the heels. The effect of this is that as the hips
turn the weight doesn’t sink down as it can tend to do when rotating on the
heels.
- Dai-Kyo-Soku-Kei (large, strong, fast, smooth)
This covers a multitude of technical points really
but I guess with regard to the Jo it has the following relevance:
-
When striking actions are made they should be
delivered with a feeling of largeness. This has the effect of relaxing key
muscles and allowing the functional ones to work unhindered. The effect on the
jo is that strikes are made with a smooth arc and accelerate through their
movement while maintaining a good level of accuracy.
-
When thrusting actions are made they should be
delivered with a smooth acceleration thus ensuring that the leg and body movement
plays an integral part of the thrust instead of merely providing a firm base
from which only the arms are used.
-
When catches are made (kuritsuke, kurihanashi,
taiatari) the body should be relaxed in the preparatory movement so that the jo
remains fixed to the body and should only be lifted as the body gets into its
evaded position.
-
The power of strikes and thrusts should be
primarily generated from the lower body; the upper body is merely an instrument
through which this power is transmitted.
- Shisei (posture)
I realise that in the west, posture is often
translated into “kamae” but I want to draw a difference between understanding
the technical points of each stances of readiness and what I think is a
slightly different aspect which is the beauty of correct and refined posture.
Firstly, being able to clearly define one kamae from
another is a key point of Jodo, it is very easy to blend them especially as
there exist small margins of allowable difference in each kamae. What one
should aim for though is the action of making a visible change from one kamae
to another rather than it being too fuzzy. Once one is able to make the changes
clear then the next stage of course is to make these transactions smooth and in
the right time with regards to the opponent.
Returning back to the “beauty” of shisei, the
posture should reflect what one should be feeling inside i.e. alertness,
flexibility, mobility and with a certain tension. In general, the lower body contains all the
strength that the body needs and should support the upper body which should
thereby be relaxed and able to produce large expressive movements.
I could of course spend an entire post devoted to
what is said about shisei but I think I should leave this for now.
So, now having written all this out, I am waiting in
an airport lounge at 5:30am after another seminar in Poland, this time led by
Murakami Sensei and I have a whole raft of other points to work on and describe
in time. Anyway, enough for now….